Grassley Demands Data from VA to Protect Second Amendment Rights of Veterans
WASHINGTON – Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is pressing the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to provide updated data about how the VA has handled reporting of veterans to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS), specifically with respect to veterans who have been assigned fiduciaries.Grassley first raised concernsabout restrictions on veterans’ Second Amendment rights in 2015.
“I take the fundamental nature of the Second Amendment very seriously and when our veterans’ right to own and possess firearms is at issue, the government must ensure that constitutional due process is followed,” Grassley wrote.
Placement on the NICS registry essentially precludes ownership and possession of a firearm. The VA reports veterans to the NICS as “adjudicated mental defective” if that veteran is assigned a fiduciary—even though those veterans may not pose any risk to themselves or others. In other words and as Grassley has previously said on the Senate floor, “Veterans are losing their Second Amendment rights because they have someone managing their checkbook.”
Grassley is seeking data on the number of veterans reported to NICS for this reason over the last four years, as well as breakdowns of how many veterans requested removal or appealed in federal court successfully and unsuccessfully. The senator also asks about how often cases receive de novo review due to the VA failing to act on requests to remove a veteran from this category within the required 365 days and how much money in fees was remitted by the VA to attorneys representing beneficiaries in these types of cases.
Grassley has previously introduced the bipartisan Veterans’ Second Amendment Rights Restoration Act, which would protect veterans’ rights by shifting the burden of proof from the veteran back to the government. He’s also led a Congressional Review Act resolution to reverse a similar Obama-era regulation at the Social Security Administration, which was signed into law in February 2017.
Full text of Grassley’s letter to the VA follows or can be found HERE.
May 5, 2022
VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION
The Honorable Denis McDonough
Department of Veterans Affairs
Dear Secretary McDonough:
Placement on the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) effectively precludes ownership and possession of firearms. According to the FBI, as of December 31, 2020, 97.9% of all names reported to the NICS list’s “mental defective” category by federal agencies were provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) even though reporting requirements apply to all federal agencies.1 As you are aware, when veterans are appointed a fiduciary to receive their VA benefits, they are deemed ineligible to receive or possess firearms or ammunition under the determination that they are now considered adjudicated mental defective for purposes of federal law.2
I take the fundamental nature of the Second Amendment very seriously and when our veterans’ right to own and possess firearms is at issue, the government must ensure that constitutional due process is followed.In March 2016, I wrote to you with respect to my concerns about the process by which the VA reports veterans to the NICS noting, in part, that during the adjudication process a veteran is not determined to be a danger to self or others yet their firearms can be taken away by the government.3 I also wrote similar oversight letters to the Justice Department and Social Security Administration raising due process concerns.4
In light of these concerns, in February 2018 and May 2019, I introduced bipartisan legislation to restore veterans’ Second Amendment rights titled, Veterans’ Second Amendment Rights Restoration Act.5I also drafted and led a Resolution of Disapproval under the Congressional Review Act to repeal a Social Security Administration rule that required that agency to report beneficiaries to the NICS list for purposes of taking away their firearms.6 I led that repeal to protect the Second Amendment rights of our Social Security beneficiaries. That repeal passed the Senate and House and was signed into law by President Trump on February 28, 2017.7
Today, I am writing to request updated data with respect to how the VA has handled the reporting of veterans to the NICS. No later than May 20, 2022, please provide answers to the following with respect to the NICS adjudicated mental health category:
Total VA-referred active NICS records annually from Dec. 31, 2017, through December 31, 2021.
For each year, breakouts according to the subcategories listed below, as applicable:
The number of deceased beneficiariesremoved from the adjudicated mental health category;
The number beneficiaries added to the adjudicated mental health category;
The number of beneficiaries who requested removal from the NICS adjudicated mental health category; and
The number of beneficiaries who were granted removal from the NICS adjudicated mental health category.
For each year, how manyadjudicated mental health category removal cases weresubject to:
De novo review, due to the VA failing to act on a request within the statutorily required 365 days; and
Plaintiffs prevailed against the VA based on a de novo hearing.
For each year, when a request for removal from the adjudicated mental health category was denied by the VA, how many beneficiaries appealed to federal court and what was the outcome?
For each year, how many beneficiaries:
Accepted assignment of a fiduciary;
Challenged the assignment of a fiduciary; and
Successfully challenged the assignment of a fiduciary.
For each year, how much money in fees was remitted by the VA to attorneys representing plaintiffs in cases involving removal from the adjudicated mental health category?
For each year, how many erroneous VA records were removed from the NICS?