Skip to content

Durbin Reveals New Whistleblower Information For Investigation Into Kash Patel Joyriding To The Olympics

Credible whistleblowers detail to the Senate Judiciary Committee how Patel’s excessive misuse and mismanagement of FBI-controlled aircraft and resources impacted or delayed high-profile investigations, such as the Charlie Kirk and Brown University shootings

WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, provided new whistleblower disclosures to support the investigation into FBI Director Kash Patel’s excessive use of FBI aircraft for personal travel. These disclosures were provided after Patel was spotted celebrating with the U.S. Men’s Olympic Hockey Team shortly after their win over Canada in the gold medal game.

In a follow-up letter to the Government Accountability Office (GAO) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of the Inspector General (OIG), Durbin adds the latest irresponsible use of government resources to GAO’s ongoing review and requests an OIG investigation. Durbin first requested the review in May 2025.

Durbin wrote: “Since his confirmation as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Kash Patel has seemingly engaged in what amounts to irresponsible joyriding on DOJ and FBI-operated aircraft at the expense of the American taxpayer and to the detriment of ongoing Bureau operations. I request that the GAO’s ongoing review address the new information outlined below and that the Department of Justice’s Office of the Inspector General (DOJ OIG) investigate Director Patel’s misuse or mismanagement of government resources.”

Durbin then cited contradictory claims from FBI spokesperson Ben Williamson and Director Patel himself regarding his trip to Italy.

Durbin then disclosed credible whistleblower information provided to the Senate Judiciary Committee about how Patel’s excessive misuse and mismanagement of FBI-controlled aircraft and resources impacted or delayed high-profile investigations, such as the Charlie Kirk and Brown University shootings.

Durbin wrote: “However, the Director’s personal leisure activities and travel bucket list should not dictate work travel, nor should it have a material impact on the Bureau’s time-sensitive operations and investigations. Unfortunately, as a credible source described to my staff, the tone was set early during Director Patel’s tenure when he said in a meeting with the field offices last year, ‘If you have golf, hockey, fishing, or hunting and beautiful sights, you’re going to see a lot of me.’ As has been reported, the Director’s frequent misuse of the FBI’s Gulfstream jets for personal travel has even frustrated White House and DOJ senior staff.”

Durbin continued: “Through additional, credible whistleblower disclosures, I have learned how the Director’s decisions related to DOJ or FBI-controlled aircraft have negatively impacted high-profile criminal investigations. For example, in the immediate aftermath of the murder of Charlie Kirk, the FBI’s shooting reconstruction team was asked to fly to Utah to aid the investigation and process the scene. However, the team’s deployment was delayed by at least a day because of a Bureau plane and pilot shortage caused by the Director’s personal flights. FAA rules dictate the maximum flight duty, cumulative travel, and rest periods for pilots, and the FBI team could only travel after the pilots’ mandated rest periods were completed.”

Durbin added: “The Director’s misplaced priorities and poor management of the FBI’s resources—including its aircraft—also harmed the FBI’s ability to respond to the shooting at Brown University on December 13, 2025. Once again, the shooting reconstruction team was set to respond to the scene immediately, but was unable to fly out of Richmond, Virginia, using one of the FBI’s planes. According to a whistleblower, the Director made the call that he wanted the Hostage Rescue Team (HRT) on standby to respond to the shooting. HRT is the FBI’s full time specialized counterterrorism unit and is generally activated for situations that one of the FBI’s 56 SWAT teams cannot handle. Notably, the Boston Field Office, which has responsibility for Providence, Rhode Island, has an enhanced SWAT team, as does the New York Field Office. All the SWAT teams in the region would have been aware of the Brown University shooting and ready to respond if needed—not requiring HRT to be put on standby. The Director’s decision caused immediate confusion because 1) that order was not communicated to HRT; 2) it upended the responsibility typically assigned to the local field office closest to the incident in question—in this case Boston or New York City—to provide immediate support; and 3) it froze the aircraft’s usage by any other FBI team until the Director removed the hold. The whistleblower described how the team had to drive from Quantico, Virginia to Providence, Rhode Island overnight during a winter storm to reach the scene by 9:00 a.m. the following morning to immediately process evidence.”

Durbin further added: “It also cannot be ignored that the Director’s latest personal jaunt occurred on the same weekend an armed intruder attempted to breach President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence. The man was allegedly carrying a gas can and a shotgun, and he was killed on the scene by law enforcement. This potential threat and concerning security breach follows two other assassination attempts on President Trump’s life since 2024. While the Director issued a statement claiming the Bureau is ‘dedicating all necessary resources’ to investigating the incident and will work closely with federal and state partners, it is not yet known if those resources have been delayed or diminished by the Director’s misuse or mismanagement of government resources—as was the case in the Charlie Kirk and Brown University shootings.”

Durbin concluded, before requesting GAO to incorporate the latest information into its investigation and encouraging DOJ OIG to open an investigation: “As I noted in my previous letter, the Director’s frequent and unapologetic use of DOJ or FBI-controlled aircraft for personal travel raises concerns about whether he is complying with applicable regulations and reimbursement requirements for non-mission-related travel and whether the Department has sufficient internal controls to track and enforce those obligations. Moreover, the information provided by credible whistleblowers makes it clear that not only are the Director’s misuse and mismanagement of these aircraft problematic to taxpayers, they materially harm the mission of the very agency he has sworn to lead. As federal law enforcement is navigating multiple crises—including Americans facing significant danger after a prominent cartel leader was killed in Mexico—the FBI cannot afford to have its resources further stretched by a Director who views its staff and aircraft as a means to support his jet-setting lifestyle.”

Click here for a PDF of the letter to GAO and DOJ OIG.

-30-